Although the content of the article(s) archived were correct at the time of writing, the accuracy of the information should not be relied upon, as it may have been subject to subsequent tax, legislative or event changes.
The US central bank, known as the Fed, lowered its key lending rate by 0.25%, a move often referred to as dovish. Widely anticipated by investors, it was the first adjustment to US interest rates since December 2024. Helped by expectations of two further rate cuts this year, the US equity market index, the S&P 500 as well as the technology focused Nasdaq Composite index both ended the week at all-time highs.
The Fed has two responsibilities: to maintain price stability (i.e. target an inflation rate of 2%), while also, unusually, ensuring maximum employment. In contrast with this mandate balancing act, many other major central banks, including the Bank of England (BoE), only need to concentrate on the core goal of price stability, which primarily involves managing inflation.
The Fed’s dual focus can prove difficult when it only has one tool, interest rates, to control both. The result is the Fed often needs to prioritise either employment or inflation. Currently, the Fed finds itself in a situation where job growth is slowing while inflation remains above its 2% target, and higher than it was a year ago.
The Fed called its rate decision a ‘risk-management cut’. Investors interpret this as meaning support for the jobs market is now the priority, even if inflation remains high. Fed chair Jerome Powell has highlighted the two key negatives for US employment were tariffs and the immigration crackdown. The recent downward revision to the annual job creation numbers, as well as ongoing employment data below analysts’ expectations, featured in the central bank’s calculations to cut interest rates.
Greg Venizelos, SJP’s fixed income strategist highlighted the risk-management aspect of the Fed’s interest rate cut. “Post Covid, the Fed was late to raise interest rates. Remember when they described inflation as being ‘transitory’ during the pandemic? What we are seeing now is the US central bank being more proactive regarding possible problems in its jobs market. Even so, they are cutting rates as economic growth forecasts for the global (and US) economies are being raised. US equity valuations have also been increasing”.
There are fears any slowdown in the US jobs market risks affecting consumer confidence and consumption, which is seen as dangerous for the broader economy. The Fed’s conundrum is that cutting rates now could support the jobs market but it could also potentially harm its reputation if the job market doesn’t improve and inflation remains high.
In contrast the BoE decided to hold rates last week. It’s decision not to move was that at 3.8%, UK inflation is stubbornly above the UK central bank’s 2% target. Certain sectors such as food and the housing rental market are major culprits here, as well as wage growth. Yet the BoE retained its guidance on future rate cuts as ‘gradual and careful’. In contrast with the Fed, it has already cut interest rates four times since last November. Despite domestic inflation above target, the slow-down in the domestic jobs market is a major concern, with risks that as in the US, it will continue to weaken.
The BoE also took the decision to reduce its rate of its bond (also known as gilt) sales from £100 billion annually to £70 billion. Known as quantitative tightening (QT), this process is the opposite of quantitative easing (QE). A slowdown in the rate of gilt sales is expected to provide a number of benefits, chief among them being to support gilt prices. Because gilt prices and gilt yields move in opposite directions, many analysts see this helping ease some of the upward pressure on bond yields and the cost of servicing the government’s debt.
The US smaller companies Russell 2000 index joined the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices in reaching a record high during the week following the Fed’s interest rate cut. Many other assets also rose, including gold, silver and the US dollar. US 10-year bond yields inched higher (while prices fell) and the oil price also ended lower. Positive AI-related news flow continued to dominate the headlines, with US mega-cap technology shares outperforming the broader S&P 500.
Across Europe, sentiment was more mixed. The MSCI Europe ex-UK benchmark ended slightly higher, but the UK’s FTSE 100 slipped, as did a number of other European markets. The pound slipped against the US dollar.
Elsewhere, Asian emerging markets rallied, although mainland Chinese shares closed lower in response to weak data on retail sales and industrial output. Japanese markets also ended in the red.
As gold doesn’t pay interest, its relative attractiveness to other assets increases when interest rates fall. The weaker value of the US dollar since the beginning of the year makes gold cheaper for non-US buyers. Global trade tensions are also encouraging a ‘flight to safety’, increasing demand for gold.
The value of an investment with St. James's Place will be directly linked to the performance of the funds selected and may fall as well as rise. You may get back less than the amount invested.
Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
The information contained is correct as at the date of the article. The information contained does not constitute investment advice and is not intended to state, indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future results or expectations. Where the opinions of third parties are offered, these may not necessarily reflect those of St. James's Place.
Source: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the “LSE Group”). ©LSE Group 2025. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies.
“FTSE Russell®” is a trade mark of the relevant LSE Group companies and is used by any other LSE Group company under license. All rights in the FTSE Russell indexes or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indexes or data and no party may rely on any indexes or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company’s express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.
© S&P Dow Jones LLC 2025; all rights reserved
Source: MSCI. Certain information contained herein, including without limitation text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the copyrighted, trade secret, trademarked and/or proprietary property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries (collectively, “MSCI”), or MSCI’s licensors, direct or indirect suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the “Information Providers”), is provided for informational purposes only, and may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced, resold or redisseminated in whole or in part, without prior written consent.
Source: Bloomberg. BLOOMBERG®” and the Bloomberg indices listed herein (the “Indices”) are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the Indices (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by the distributor hereof (the “Licensee”). Bloomberg is not affiliated with Licensee, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend the financial products named herein (the “Products”). Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accuracy, or completeness of any data or information relating to the Products.
SJP Approved 22/09/2025