Although the content of the article(s) archived were correct at the time of writing, the accuracy of the information should not be relied upon, as it may have been subject to subsequent tax, legislative or event changes.
Markets shaken by fast flowing news cycle
The weekend proved just how fast events can turn, with President Trump’s threats to impose tariffs on all countries that oppose his plans to buy Greenland.
Unsurprisingly, news of a potential trade war sent European markets down on Monday morning, with US futures also looking negative.
Before this, markets had seemed remarkably sanguine in the face of numerous potential headwinds.
A skim of the news last week would show arguments about Greenland already ongoing, continued uncertainty in Venezuela, and Iran struggling with a currency collapse and mass protests. On top of this there were ongoing tensions in the Far East over China’s claims around Taiwan.
At the same time, Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell is under investigation in the US, reflecting what many see as an attempt to weaken the central bank’s ability to set interest rate policy.
Despite this, US equities hit record highs early last week before falling slightly, and US Treasury bonds ended close to where they started. Meanwhile the FTSE 100 marched further into record territory as the week progressed. Generally, since the big selloff in April last year, volatility had remained remarkably low across the world.
Market faith
The simple explanation for performance up to last Friday was that large, institutional investment houses didn’t believe tensions were going to result in actual geopolitical shocks.
Ultimately global markets suggest most investors thought events would eventually blow over or at least a compromise could be found, for example, as in the past.
According to Greg Venizelos, Fixed Income Strategist at SJP: “I think a lot of the market just didn’t believe a lot of what’s being talked about was going to happen. For example, if China were to invade Taiwan, that would obviously be really big. But talking to others around the industry, no one thinks China would be prepared to take such a risk for some time.”
Looking at the US specifically, however, Greg notes: “There is a general expectation that the November mid term elections will see the Democrats take control of the House. That should moderate the current administration’s actions somewhat. I think that is giving markets comfort.”
UK GDP surprise
In the UK there was some relatively good news last week, as the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that UK GDP grew by 0.3% in November. This was above the 0.1% expected.
According to the ONS, this increase was driven by increased economic output. The monthly figure was helped by Jaguar Land Rover facilities returning to production in the month, after a cyber-attack temporarily took them offline for September and much of October.
While this helped UK equities, given the FTSE 100 has been on an upward trend for some time now it seems unlikely that it was the only factor.
UK shares have been helped by investors looking to diversify their portfolio away from US technology companies in recent months. The FTSE 100, dominated by banks and mining companies, is well placed to act as such a diversifier. It’s no surprise that its ten best performing companies last year and year-to-date are all in mining, financials or defence.
Snap Japan election
Finally, there are reports that the Japanese prime minister Sanae Takaichi is considering a snap election, possibly as early as February.
Takaichi currently leads a coalition with a razor thin majority in the Japanese House of Representatives, however she is polling very well. She will be hoping this personal popularity translates to increased seats for her party.
Martin Hennecke, Head of Asia & Middle East Investment Advisory & Comms at SJP, warns: “Takaichi still appears to have a high approval rating compared to a relatively fragmented opposition. That said, investors might want to pay more attention to economic and businesses’ fundamentals than political developments. The room to manoeuvre for whoever is in charge will be constrained by a combination of significant economic, demographic and sovereign debt challenges to deal with.”
So far Japanese shares have had a good start to 2026, building on their strong returns in 2025. On the other hand, Japanese government bond yields have continued to rally. They are now nearly double where they stood at the start of 2025, meaning the government will have to be contending with increased interest payments in the future.
Mansion tax could hit more homes
Homes currently costing £1.5 million could be hit by the new mansion tax as the government plans to expand the scope of its revaluation efforts.
The government’s Valuation Office Agency confirmed it was starting a review of homes in England believed to be worth £1.5 million or more to ensure their valuations were accurate and did not exceed the £2 million mansion tax threshold.
The review will see the largest revaluation of homes in more than three decades, covering up to 200,000 properties previously valued at up to £5 million. Critics have warned that broadening the valuation criteria is likely to drag more homes into the mansion tax.
The mansion tax was announced in the 2025 Autumn Budget and will come into force in April 2028. The levy will be charged in bands according to the value of homes.
For example, a house worth between £2 million and £2.5 million will face an annual council tax surcharge of £2,500. This will rise to a maximum of £7,500 for a property worth more than £5 million.
The mansion tax is expected to raise around £400 million for the government in the tax year 2029/30, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility.1
The Scottish government last week unveiled a similar plan to apply a mansion tax on homes worth over £1 million, as part of its own Budget.
Financial ambition fading amid economic trouble
Economic pressures and uncertainty are causing growing numbers of households across the UK to put off long-term financial planning.
This is according to our Real Life Advice Report 2025 carried out by Opinium to find out how find out attitudes to money, financial advice and the future had changed over time. Opinium surveyed 8,000 UK adults nationwide between 22nd July and 5th August 2025, and refreshed shorter surveys of a further 2,050 UK adults between 28th November and 6th December 2025.Quantitative data is taken from these surveys. Quotas and post-weighting were applied to the both samples to make the datasets representative of the UK adult population.
The final chapter of the 2025 Real Life Advice report highlights that the number of adults with no financial ambitions for the next year rose from around one in 10 (13%) to one in five (21%) between July and December 2025.
A key factor driving this is a bigger focus on day-to-day spending due to the increase in the cost of living, making it less possible for households to plan for the long term.
James Rainbow, chief executive officer at St James’s Place Wealth Management, said: “This widening ‘ambition gap’ speaks to a deeper challenge: when financial pressure becomes the norm, confidence in the future erodes, making long-term planning feel less possible for many households.”
The levels and bases of taxation, and reliefs from taxation, can change at any time. The value of any tax relief depends on individual circumstances.
Source1 Office for Budget Responsibility - November 2025
The value of an investment with St. James's Place will be directly linked to the performance of the funds selected and may fall as well as rise. You may get back less than the amount invested.
Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
The information contained is correct as at the date of the article. The information contained does not constitute investment advice and is not intended to state, indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future results or expectations. Where the opinions of third parties are offered, these may not necessarily reflect those of St. James's Place.
Source: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the “LSE Group”). ©LSE Group 2025. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies.
“FTSE Russell®” is a trade mark of the relevant LSE Group companies and is used by any other LSE Group company under license. All rights in the FTSE Russell indexes or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indexes or data and no party may rely on any indexes or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company’s express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.
© S&P Dow Jones LLC 2025; all rights reserved
Source: MSCI. Certain information contained herein, including without limitation text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the copyrighted, trade secret, trademarked and/or proprietary property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries (collectively, “MSCI”), or MSCI’s licensors, direct or indirect suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the “Information Providers”), is provided for informational purposes only, and may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced, resold or redisseminated in whole or in part, without prior written consent.
Source: Bloomberg. BLOOMBERG®” and the Bloomberg indices listed herein (the “Indices”) are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the Indices (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by the distributor hereof (the “Licensee”). Bloomberg is not affiliated with Licensee, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend the financial products named herein (the “Products”). Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accuracy, or completeness of any data or information relating to the Products.
SJP Approved 19/01/2026